Unit Title :- Legal Analysis And Critique
Assessment Type :- Assignment
Word limit :- 1,000 words – excludes footnotes, titles and headings.
Foot notes :- in accordance with the AGLC.
Bibliography :- no
Format :- A word limit of 1,000 words has been set which excludes foot notes titles and headings. The word limit will be strictly enforced Please remember that this assignment has been structured so that a well-considered and scholarly written assignment may be achieved with in the prescribed word limit.
Legal Analysis And Critique Assignment – Australia
There are strict formatting requirements with which students are required to comply:
Ensure your full name and student number appears on the footer of each page.
Number all pages consecutively.
Question :-
Chapter 7 of Connecting with Law provides an overview of major schools of thought in law or jurisprudential schools. Critically analyse the decision in Commonwealth v Australian Capital Territory (2013) 250 CLR 441 and discuss: how do the theoretical materials studied in the subject so far help us to under stand and critique the decision?
Legal Analysis And Critique Assignment – Australia
You should consider in your essay how the decision aligns with a particular jurisprudential school studied in the subject so far. Discuss the judgment from the perspective of natural law positivist debate. Your essay should make reference to at least one of the key theorists noted in Chapter 7 of Connecting with Law.
Legal Analysis And Critique Assignment – Australia